E-ISSN:2319-3050

Research Article

Sports Psychology

International Journal of Research Padagogy and Technology in Education and Movement Sciences

2023 Volume 12 Number 02 APR-JUN
Publisherwww.theuniversityacademics.com

A STUDY OF PERSONALITY AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIAL AMONG FEMALE TEAM SPORTS PERSON IN SOME SELECTED GAMES

Thakur J.1*
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55968/ijems.v12i02.251

1* Jitender Thakur, Assistant Professor, Physical Education, Govt Degree College, Theog, Shimla, H.P., India .

The purpose of the study was to find the personality as a psychologicaldifferential amongfemaleteam sports person in some selected games. For the purpose of the study, 22female team sports person (11 Handball 11Hockey) were randomly selected as the subjects for the study. Thevariable selected for the purpose of this study was:Personality. The Personality was assessed by the total scores in Personality Inventory by S.S Jalota and S.D Kapoor Eysenck’s “Personality Inventory” adapted and standardized in India. With the help of the questionnaire related to personality as apsychologicalvariable necessary data were collected. Data were collected with regard to personality variable from 22female team sports person in a group setting. Before administering of research questionnaire, the Team Incharges, Coaches/Managers of different teams were contacted and their cooperation in the task of data collection was solicited.The data pertaining to Personality variable had been analyzed by using the ‘t’ test in order to assess and compare the psychological variableamong interuniversity femaleVolleyballteam sports person and interuniversity female Basketball team sports person. The findings of the study revealed that there is a significant difference among inter university female team sports person. On the basis of the findings of the study, the following conclusions are drawn:The inter university femaleHandball sports person are better on the variable of personality in comparison to inter university female Hockey team sports person.

Keywords: Personality, Team Sports Person, Handball and Hockey

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Jitender Thakur, Assistant Professor, Physical Education, Govt Degree College, Theog, Shimla, H.P., India .
Email:
Jitender Thakur, A STUDY OF PERSONALITY AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIAL AMONG FEMALE TEAM SPORTS PERSON IN SOME SELECTED GAMES. IJEMS. 2023;12(02):71-75.
Available From
https://ijems.net/index.php/ijem/article/view/251

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2023-02-08 2023-02-23 2023-03-08 2023-04-19 2023-05-17
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
NIL NO YES 17%

© 2023by Jitender Thakurand Published by The University Academics. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Sports come cloaked in many guises-men in defiance of nature, man confronting man, man against animal, man against machine. The range of athletic competition is great from individual contests to team meets, from summer games to winter past times from regional events to national competition. Whether aquatics, skiing or hot dog skiing, motorcycle racing or motorboat racing, demolition derby or Irish Sweepstakes Derby, lumberjacking or wrist wrestling, Gaelic games or Olympic games, each has its own unique character, its own interest and passion, and its own enthusiasts. All sports however have two common denominator dynamic challenges to man and a psychological spur to victory.

Sports psychology is the scientific study of behavior in sports or sports related context. It is apsychological attempt to understand underlying sports behavior. Sports psychology is defined as the study of mental processes as they relate to human sports performance. It consists of theories and laws of learning the importance of reinforcement and the linking of perceptual abilities with motor performance which contribute to the body of knowledge. The sports psychologists utilize the information when studying topics such as aggression, intelligence, Personality and personality development.

The Personality is a dynamic organization within the individual of those psycho-physical systems that determine his unique Personality to the environment (Allport, 1948).The personality trait concepts are also very much a part of Eysenck’s (1967) theory of personality. In Eysenck’s (1993) view, personality consists of hierarchy structure of personality factors. At the top of this hierarchy are broad, general dimensions called types. Personality composed of traits, which in turn are made up of habitual responses, which are composed of specific response, the behavior actually observed, Eysenck et. al (1962) hypothesized three broad personality dimensions: neuroticism stability, extraversion –introversion and psychoticism, which are evaluated and measured through a personality inventory. The Eysenck personality inventory (EPI) is designed to measure the two pervasive and relatively independent dimensions of neuroticism stability and extraversion – introversion as identified by Eysenck (1964). Neuroticism refers to general emotional

instability and the individual‘s predisposition to neurotic breakdown under stress, while extraversion refers to the uninhibitive, outgoing, impulsive, and sociable inclinations of a person. Cattell (1962) defined trait as structure of the personality inferred from behavior in different situations. He distinguishes four types of traits as common traits which are widely distributed in general population like honesty, aggression, cooperation;

The purpose of the study was to find the “Personality as a Psychological Differential among FemaleTeam Sports person in some selected games”. It was hypothesized that there might not have been significant difference in personality as a psychological variable among femaleteam sports person.

Method

Sample

For the purpose of the study, 22female team sports person (11 Handball 11 Hockey) were randomly selected as the subjects for the study.

 Tool

The variable selected for the purpose of this study was: Personality. The Personality was assessed by the total scores in S.S Jalota and S.D Kapoor Eysenck’s “Personality Inventory” adapted and standardized in India.

Procedure

With the help of the questionnaire related topersonality asa psychologicalvariable necessary data were collected. Data were collected with regard to personality variable from 22female team sports person in a group setting. Before administering of research questionnaire, the Team Incharge, Coaches/Managers of different teams were contacted and their cooperation in the task of data collection was solicited.

Techniques

The data pertaining to personality variable had been analyzed by using the‘t’ test in order to assess and compare the psychological variable among interuniversity femaleHandballteam sports person and interuniversity femaleHockey team sports person.

 

 


Results

The findings pertaining to descriptive statistics for thepersonalityvariable among interuniversity femaleHandball team sports person and interuniversity femaleHockey team sports person have been presented in table no. 1

 Table 1: ‘t’ value for Inter-university FemaleHandball Team Sports person and Inter-university Female Hockey TeamSports person with respect to their Mean Score on ‘Personality’

Enclosed as Annexure 01

Table 1 reveals that the ‘t’ value for Inter university femaleHandball team sports person and inter universityfemaleHockey team sports person with respect to their mean score on ‘Personality’ came out to be 4.29 (‘t’ = 2.20for df 20) which is significant at 0.05 level of confidence. This indicates that the inter university femaleHandball team sports person differ significantly with respect to ‘Personality’. Since the mean score for inter university femaleHandball team sports person (53.91) is higher in comparison to inter university femaleHockey team sports person (26.27), it may be interpreted inter university femaleHandball team sports person are more neurotic which is nothing but reflection of extreme level of cortical nervous functioning under situation which leads to arousal. They are uninhibitive, impulsive, dominant, assertive, craving for excitement and activities, often tends to take chances and risks, express their feeling openly in comparison to the inter university femaleHockey team sports person. Hence the formulated null hypothesis that “There will be no significant difference between inter university femaleHockey team sports person and inter university femaleHandball team sports person on personality” stands rejected.

Total Personality is graphically depicted in the figures 1 in which comparison of mean value of inter university female teamHandball sports person and inter university femaleHockeyteam sports person are shown by drawing the histogram type of graph. The difference in the height of histogram indicates the mean difference.

Fig 01: Mean Score

Enclosed as Annexure 02

Discussion

The result presented in the table 1 indicated that inter university femaleHockey team sports person are the lowest scorer in the ‘personality’ whereasinter university femaleHandball team sports person were found highest scorer. The results expressed that inter university femaleHockey team sports person do not hold better personality to compete in team sports as compared to inter university femaleHandball team sports person. The results attributed that inter university femaleHockey team sports person are more serious because they want to win the competition. They know that loosing in sports will cause great loss to their personality. So they want to win at any cost. ContrarilyInter university femaleHandball team sports person showing better personality because they never bothered about their performance and achievement. They knew that winning or losing will not cause any effect to their personality. These players afford to be winner or loser.

Discussion of Hypothesis

The hypothesis earlier set that there might have not been significant difference in Personality as apsychological variable among femaleteam sports person is rejected.

Conclusions

On the basis of the findings of the study, the following conclusions are drawn: The inter university femaleHandball team sports person are better on the variable of personality in comparison to inter universityfemaleHockey team sports person.

Annexure

Annexure 01 

Table 1: ‘t’ value for Inter-university FemaleHandball Team Sports person and Inter-university Female Hockey TeamSports person with respect to their Mean Score on ‘Personality’

p002.png

Annexure 02

Fig 01: Mean Score


p001.png

Reference

Allport Garden W. “Personality: A Psychological Interpretation” New York: Holf, 1973. . [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Cattell, RB. (1962). “Abilities: their structure, growth and action” Bision: Houghton Mifflin. [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Eysenck H. J. ,(1967). “The psychological basis of personality” Springfield’s Illinois. [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh, M. , Kadhim, M. M. , Turki Jalil, A. et al. A systematic review of the protective effects of silymarin/silibinin against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Cancer Cell Int 23, 88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-02936-4 https://cancerci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12935-023-02936-4 [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh Nathial, Analysis of set shot in basketball in relation with time to perform the course and displacement of center of gravity, American Journal of Sports Science, Vol. 2 Issue. 5 pp: 122-126 (2014). Retrieved from https://www. sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=155&doi=10.11648/j.ajss.20140205.13 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh (2010). Evaluation And Improvement Of Sports Techniques Through Biomechanical Updated Analyzing Technology, University News, Journal of Higher Education Association of Indian Universities, Association of Indian Universities, Vol:48:Issue. 05;2010 Pp45-57, 2010. sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=155&doi=10.11648/j.ajss.20140205.13 [Crossref][Google Scholar] [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh Nathial, A Study of Adjustment and Emotional Intelligence of University Coaches in India, American Journal of Applied Psychology. Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2014 , pp. 122-126. doi: 10. 11648/j.ajap.20140306.11 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Nathial, Mandeep Singh. A COMPARATIVE AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF SELF-ESTEEM AND JOB SATISFACTION IN ATHLETES AND NON ATHLETES. Journal of Advances in Social Science and Humanities, 2(10). https://doi. org/10.15520/jassh210123 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh, M. , Kour, R. , & Kour, A. ,. A collaborative diversified investigation of respective responses of sports person coaches and organizations on criminalization of doping.International Journal of Health Sciences,6(S3), 11295–11310. [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh. , Assessment of Vocational Interests of Pahadi&Bakarwal School Students In Relation To Their Gender. Int J Recent Sci Res. 9(3), pp. 24817-24819. DOI: [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Dr. Mandeep Singh, 2017. “A study of awareness of inhouse doping errors among national level players and sports administrators in J&K state of India”, International Journal of Current Research, 9, (01), 45226-45227. http://www. journalcra.com/sites/default/files/issue-pdf/20036.pdf [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh, 2019; “Effect of Mobile Screen Psychomotor Digital Image Motivators in Person Technique in Reducing Anxiety Level of Intervarsity Players of Cluster University Jammu, Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). Volume-9 Issue-1, October 2019, PP: 3750-3752, DOI: 10. 35940/ijeat. A9811. 109119. [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh. (2018). THE AWARENESS OF MOVEMENT AND FITNESS SCIENCES AMONG SCHOOL, UNDER GRADUATE AND POST GRADUATE LEVEL STUDENTS: EMPOWERING EDUCATION THROUGH PHYSICAL EDUCATION. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(3). [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SINGH SIDHU, A. , & SINGH, M. (2022). KINEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF HURDLE CLEARANCE


TECHNIQUE IN 110M HURDLE RACE. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 4(2), 28–35. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh, A. , & Singh , D. M. (2013). PROMOTION OF RESEARCH CULTURE –ENHANCING QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 2(2), 202–208. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SINGH, M. , & SINGH SIDHU, A. (2016). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BODY COMPOSITION AND RELATIVE HEALTH STATUS AMONG RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT SCHOOLS OF J&K. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 5(3), 08–13. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh Nathial, D. M. (2012). ANALYZING THE CREDIT BASED SYSTEM IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 1(3), 172–176. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SHARMA, N. P. , & SINGH, M. (2014). SENIOR AGE GROUP RELATIVE EXERCISES AND IMPACT ON THEIR LIFESTYLE. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 3(04), 78–82. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

CHAND PURI, P. , MISHRA, P. , JHAJHARIA, B. , & SINGH, M. (2014). COORDINATIVE ABILITIES OF VOLLEYBALL IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 3(3), 56–68. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Dr. Mandeep Singh & J N Baliya, 2013; “A study of family stress among working and non-working parents”, International Journal of Research in Social Sciences. Vol 2, 2. 194-201. [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Eysenck et. al. (1962). “Sports and Personality Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy” An International Review Journal, 4(1): 1-56. [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Eysenck H. J. (1993). “Manual for Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI)” India,. [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Eysenck H. J. (1964). “Extraversion and acquisition of eye blink and GSR conditioned responses” Psychology bulletin,663:258-270. [Crossref][Google Scholar]