E-ISSN:2319-3050

Research Article

2023 Volume 12 Number 02 APR-JUN
Publisherwww.theuniversityacademics.com

PSYCHOLOGY AND INJURED ATHLETE

Sangwan R1*
DOI: DOI:https://doi.org/10.55968/ijems.v13i02

1* Rakesh Sangwan, Department of Physical Education, SRM college of Education, Hisar, Haryana, India.

Some athletes are prone to concussions, while others are not usually involved for clinical reasons. Regularly, it seems obvious, it is possible that the most notable athletes are the most injured, but perhaps the reverse is attested. Sports fans inevitably regard truly injured players, who return to play in record time, with discomfort to give the system a little psyche to clear. Taking everything into account, some athletes have been known to require psychiatric treatment during rehabilitation. Certainly, even injuries are not required to be seen in the life of athletes, they are basically a part of the legitimacy of every athlete profession. Injury is generally viewed as a primary issue that begins at the time the injury occurred and ends when the athlete is back in business, playing and engaging. Incidentally, injury can affect an athlete's general plans in general when the athlete cannot collapse one's overall specific reach or upset. In addition to injury, credits can be affected through an athlete's assessment, leads, social interactions, and even general appearance. As demonstrated by these certified components, sports injury should be viewed as a more abstract whole than the original issue itself, and should be treated in the same way as a more fundamental aggregate. Psychological reactions to an injury and all recovery can impact the time used and progress of rehabilitation, and return to wear and tear. So clearly psychological responses to an injury need to be taken into account and shape the treatment plan.

Keywords: Athlete, Injury, Psychological

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Rakesh Sangwan, Department of Physical Education, SRM college of Education, , Hisar, Haryana, India.
Email:
Sangwan R, PSYCHOLOGY AND INJURED ATHLETE. IJEMS. 2023;12(02):294-301.
Available From
https://ijems.net/index.php/ijem/article/view/295

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2023-02-09 2023-01-10 2024-03-13 2024-03-07 2024-04-17
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Nil Nil Yes

© 2023by Sangwan Rand Published by The University Academics. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

INTRODUCTION

The guide may intentionally or suddenly leave the injured athlete "out" at the party's rehearsal, with no proper contact with the coach or social connection. Despite the athlete being injured, the Guides actually have a social program to run. Some coaches may also think that when an athlete is injured, the athlete is a fool. Talking plainly this may be the reality but it is monstrous to keep in touch with the counselors and get-togethers for the rehabilitation undertaking of the athletes. Sensible contact between the injured athlete and the guide is useful for rehabilitation results and return to wear. There are more ways than one way for a coach to be aware of an athlete at the time of an injury. (Arvinen, 2020)

The uncertainty about the outcome of injury upon torture and execution is clearly an epic figure that illustrates how quick rehabilitation is. There is hardly any singular attribution seen related to the onset of athletic injuries. Psychological stress, regardless, has been shown to anticipate an increase in injury. Therefore, the stress caused by thinking about titanic remarkable circumstances, (eg, moving to another city or school or losing a partner or relative) as well as smaller general problems, eg, having a hot plan, can be a long-term relationship.

Clearly, the psychological parts don't hurt predictably without the help of another person. Instead, when other confounding factors, for example, unilateral properties of muscles, are present or when athletes are set in an injury-prone situation (for example, when proven contact is made in a surprising position ) so they increase their chances of getting injured. Stress is an attempt to widen the scope of the injury by looking at the terrible discomfort associated with the obsession or thought and the extended muscle tension associated with the increased stress. Injury-prone athletes typically appear to be individuals who experience widespread life stress, who have insignificant social support from others, and who have hardly any psychologically developed skills. (Brewer, 2017)

Furthermore, mentors who highlight areas of strength for the serious to fight and win have little regard for the actual condition of the athlete, and sacrifice their bodies for the party

to overcome the hardships that befell the players. May have to face and get injured. Trust and open correspondence increase data from monitors and tutors on both the occasion of wounding and the level of stress that can exacerbate wounds.

The guides anticipate a quick run in the event of injuries from the handicap of the actual components to the way they prepare and set up athletes, when athletes are allowed to return to challenge following injuries and athletes Exactly how sports drug staff talk. (Cavin, 2019)

Athletic assistants must acquire several primary skills in order to do the job, including being an excellent meeting member. They must find an appropriate technique to treat the whole athlete, regardless of injury. They should really consider how the athletic consultant characterizes the injury or rehabilitation cycle to the athlete, how fast the athlete can recover. The athletic aide should help the athlete portray midway and giant length goals to ultimately achieve full recovery.

Sports injuries harm the career and achievement of athletes. Some wounds are close to nothing and don't matter, but others can end a job and have consequences on the athlete's own performance. In addition, injuries cover rehabilitation costs, which are related to cash costs or lost time associated with athletes or perhaps sports affiliations.

An injury basically doesn't affect the actual range, yet the setting and psychological point of view do. In all actuality, in the clearest situations, injuries can deprive athletes of their compensated increased life-stress, and choose fear for re-injury, troublesome energy, severe concussions and other conduct disturbing effects.

The suspected effect of injury really depends on how much time the athletes have spent in the game: unique educated officials who have more grounded athletic individuals experience the necessary energy and character-distressing effect of the injury. In any case, this is the best way to react to injury, possibly in light of the fact that they have more psychological resources to change what is happening. (Hale, 2015)

METHODOLLOGY

For the current work, 100 athletes from Delhi-NCR were selected with the help of random sampling method. Out of these 100 athletes, 50 were male ad 50 were female respondents.


DATA ANALYSIS

Table No. 1 Classification of respondents on the basis of Family Support

Enclosed as Annexure 01

It is clear from the above table that out of total 50 male respondents, 22 respondents agree that family support helps positively during injury phase  while 13 and 7 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 5 and 3 respondents were ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘neutral’ with this statement respectively.

Similarly, out of total 50 female respondents, 24 respondents agree that family support helps positively during injury phase while 14 and 6 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 4 and 2 respondents were ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘neutral’ with this statement respectively.

Interpretation:

It is clear from the above graph that majority of the male respondents i.e.44%   agree that family support helps positively during injury phase.

Similarly, majority of the female respondents i.e. 48% agree that family support helps positively during injury phase.

 Long injury period affects the performance

Table No. 2 Classification of respondents on the basis of long injury period

Enclosed as Annexure 02

It is clear from the above table that out of total 50 male respondents, 22 respondents agree that long injury period affects the performance  while 9 and 10 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 7 and 2 respondents were ‘strongly disagree and ‘neutral with this statement respectively.

Similarly, out of total 50 female respondents, 22 respondents agree that long injury period affects the performance  while 10 and 8 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 8 and 2 respondents were ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘neutral’ with this statement respectively.

Interpretation:

It is clear from the above graph that majority of the male respondents i.e. 44% agree that long injury period affects the performance.

Similarly, majority of the female respondents i.e. 44% agree that long injury period affects the performance.

 

Better rehabilitation process enhances the performance

Table No. 3Classification of respondents on the basis of better rehabilitation

Enclosed as Annexure 03

It is clear from the above table that out of total 50 male respondents, 20 respondents agree that better rehabilitation process enhances the performance after recovering from injury  while 9 and 7 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 8 and 6 respondents were ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘neutral’ with this statement respectively.

Similarly, out of total 50 female respondents, 21 respondents agree that better rehabilitation process enhances the performance after recovering from injury while 12 and 9 respondents were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’ with this statement respectively. On the other hand, 6 and 2 respondents were ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘neutral’ with this statement respectively.

Interpretation:

It is clear from the above graph that majority of the male respondents i.e.40%   agree that better rehabilitation process enhances the performance after recovering from injury.

Similarly, majority of the female respondents i.e. 42% agree that better rehabilitation process enhances the performance after recovering from injury.

 

PSYCHOLOGY AND INJURED ATHLETE

The sports injury rehabilitation process begins at the scene of the injury. The area of true deformity in the body, the type, cause and actuality of the injury, and the specific setting of the athlete and his or her previous injuries are factors that


affect the general, psychological in addition to the specifically organized fitting focus. And, socio-fragmentary factors such as the athlete's age, title, character, or monetary status influence general, psychological, and group climate-centered attitudes. Subsequently, these three sections greatly affect panoramic results, such as the level of progress, strength and suppleness of a muscle, joint laxity, the impression of soreness and the duration of recovery. Finally, center results affect rehabilitation outcomes, similar to utilitarian performance, personal fulfillment after injury, treatment satisfaction, and return to position and wear. The central function in this model is played by psychological factors; In fact they have an indistinguishable relationship with the normal and socially-relevant parts and with the central and absurd consequences. (Hamson, 2018)

Athletes may show disapproval of the seriousness of the injury, its impact on sport performance or performance. It's possible to deny what athletes say, but more so how they contend with varying information about injury. In fact, it is necessary to see and refute a positive thought. If the athlete says "I'll be fine in only 8 months" and the physiotherapist has given an expectation of one year, this can be significant. It's thinking in a way that the athlete knows, but stops the negative thoughts, and can lead to more of a bump in following a rehabilitation program. It is excellent if the athlete invalidates the validity of the injury, shows a lack of intensity and confirmation with outside clinical staff. Refusal usually occurs after injury, before all other seasons of rehabilitation, yet overall it is not important to intervene now because this refusal is resilient to injury. Permanent withdrawal progresses during the final stage and discourages treatment, requiring psychological intervention.

Distress is offered by bleak attitudes derived from injury, such as apprehension, discouragement, shock, fear, the impression of the event, and the inhibition of self-view. The crisis is relatively more present in the first place of rehabilitation, but it is more multifaceted for injury: at this stage without a doubt it is helpful to spread a considerate relationship of trust between the injured athlete and the clinical staff. However, it is possible that the athlete experiences distress in a similar way at different stages, for example a yearning to return to sport during a last-choice season of

rehabilitation can lead to the final stages of recovery being devastating and confusing. (Thomas, 2019)

The satisfaction of rehabilitation goals and the prospect of recovery can elicit a great deal of positive basic responses to the extent of rehabilitation. Baseline states typically move from negative to positive as the athlete progresses through their rehabilitation and the reappearance of the challenge approaches. Studies have shown an expansion in the fearful effect as game strategies reappear, possibly due to the stress of re-injury, the lack of what lies ahead, as well as the emphasis that post-injury Goals can be covered. Return to sport may again be seen as a utilitarian severe shock test refusal that may have been veiled with the athlete question.

In fact an overflow of testing misses the upside of social support to harrowing extraordinary circumstances and dealing with rehabilitation from various ailments. The value of social support in the game injury setting is not an unprecedented case. Persistent social support from a variety of sources, including sports drug trained professionals, guides, colleagues and family, can be indispensable in working with injured athletes to regain strength and with multifaceted development.

One can benefit from the assistance offered by achieving the achievement of goals, attracting great change.

Athletes disclosed that they needed different types of social support from tutors and game drug arrangers who were competent (i.e., instructive, extremely close and feasible) at different locations in the recovery period. For example, explicit relief was especially necessary near the beginning of rehabilitation when athletes were attempting to adapt to the reality of their injuries. Around the satisfaction of rehabilitation, the fundamental to promoting assistance was foremost in ensuring that athletes did not return to wear in haste. (Ostrow, 2018)

As the completion of rehabilitation approaches and the re-emergence of sporting structures are expected, a level of performance concerns could build up. How fearful athletes are regarding the reappearance of sport may be a reflection of past rehabilitation progress. In any case, psychological recovery from injury is clearly not followed by a clinical opportunity to return to the wave.


A level of psychosocial issues during reappearance of sport progression is emphasized by re-adjusting nerves related to injury, achieving pre-injury levels of athletic cutoff, wonderful allies (e.g., guides, ally), perspective on deprivation, lack of athletic individuality, and lack of social support. The stresses from outside and inside to return to sport can expose brand names to difficulties in this glaring period and test the developed resources of athletes.

Athletes may experience very close success stress, at higher rates than non-athletes, and in obvious incidents. Two undeniable factors, comfort and substance use, expect vast portions in athlete psychological well-being. A collection of non-endless sports-related factors put athletes at risk for significant achievement concerns, and one essential factor is sports-related injury. Sports injury and economic prosperity appear to have a bidirectional relationship, and sports injury and the rehabilitation process are related to a broad combination of psychological and economic prosperity concerns. (Hardy, 2020)

Specialists must address physical and mental issues associated with athletic activity. This athletic development can lead to true injuries, and these injuries produce various psychological responses. Furthermore, psychological factors, particularly stress, are a fundamental precursor to injuries, are expected to play a large part in injury rehabilitation, and are instrumental in sport re-appearance.

Psychological factors e.g. stressful historical circumstances may be involved in the development of athletic injuries in a plethora of physiological and biological components. Character factors e.g. introversion/extroversion, assertiveness, and criticality. Regardless, a psychological component has been a consistently shown association between stress and athletic injury risk.

Athletes who experience increased levels of stress, whether on or off the field, are more prone to serious injuries. Certain subpopulations of athletes, for example, those experiencing wasting and altering prosperity stress and reduced covert abilities, may be at a more severe condition than the broad one supporting an athletic injury. Stress has been shown to cause muscle strains and coordination difficulties which increase an athlete's susceptibility to injury.

Athletes can be expected to experience a variety of overwhelming reactions and stress following an injury. They will attempt to translate injury-wide clinical information, track the strain of conformity with the injured and participate in the evolving responses. There is no normal development of basic responses to an athletic injury. For outspoken athletes, practice and actual work fill in as an important one small step in a time cycle to create due and convergence points for overseeing psychological issues. In these athletes, an injury may elicit a more noticeable individual stimulus than is widespread.

Dangerously valuable reactions occur when deferred consequences no longer lift or crush, or the reality of discretionary effects gives the impression of being almost equally paranoid with other injured athletes. Scary is a particularly fundamental analysis signal. It potentiates other overwhelming responses and affects recovery from injury.

DISCUSSION

Psychological precursors and basal responses expected to play an important role in injury rehabilitation. Also, some evaluations have recommended the worn of psychological designs, self-ordering, mental retraining, and comprehension are related to faster recovery. These techniques can be especially important by reducing stress and expanding systems for managing difficult times and social support.

The injury phase is the period of opportunity until the rehabilitation and recovery phase can be initiated, and it is during this phase that the athlete devotes most of the energy to the search for healing. A reasonable marker for moving to the next sorting is that the athlete begins following a rehabilitation program, which is done after the injury has been discovered and delineated. Obviously when an injury occurs the athlete goes through a personal turmoil. Indeed weakness, the consequences of injury and prolonged non-appearance from sports are major stress and perspective change makers long after the injury.

Clinical staff should obtain verification and details as quickly as possible and give them to the injured athlete, so that the athlete can begin the rehabilitation and recovery process with an understanding of what is happening and how external input may benefit . Go back to full arrangement and challenge.


Individuals involved in sports have been shown to manage relatively close and direct issues at similar or substantially higher rates than non-athletes. One explanation could be that the difficult task served as a major framework for behavioral diversity to compensate for unusual subjects beyond the difficult environment. Therefore, getting injured is not only a problem because it prevents athletes from performing, but closer to it because it makes it more difficult to overcome the various obstacles that the athlete is currently facing.

Social components such as casualty area, stress, situational credit and rehabilitation environment are affected by the characteristics of the injury. Psychological components, namely character, grasping, influence and leadership, are seen as a central part of the bio-psychosocial model. They associate with both social and general components in a fundamentally similar way. Additionally, psychological factors undoubtedly influence two endpoints of the model, most certainly sports injury rehabilitation outcomes and spastic bio-psychological outcomes.

Athletes may be redirected from their rehabilitation tasks due to a lack of experience or obsession with autonomic changes, starting a sliding bend that results in frustrating rehabilitation. If athletes fear back injury when they wear it, they may experience disgust, disgust, fearful presence, or strong scrutiny, all of which can create conditions for re-injury. In any case, aspiring athletes are subjected to a psychologically laden rehabilitation program that both informs and ensures a basic need related to recovery, a commensurate reduction in fear as they actually stick to the plan.

CONCLUSION

Psychological portions have been shown to be a necessary precursor to the onset of athletic injuries and what is expected to be an epic portion in injury rehabilitation that ultimately results in the valuable re-appearance of the sport. Pack specialists must consider the mental and affective components when arranging for treatment and consideration of injured athletes.

The athlete's injury history and previous rehabilitation experience can greatly influence the immediate response to injury and how the athlete adjusts to adversity during rehabilitation. Productive experiences during rehabilitation

in the past may help the athlete to respond less adversely to the injury than if the athlete has had negative or no rehabilitation experiences. The experience also helps to accommodate important emotions throughout the injury process.

Annexure

Annexure 01

991.png

Annexure 02

992.png

Annexure 03


99903.png

References

Arvinen-Barrow, M. , Penny, G. , Hemmings, B. & Corr, S. (2020). UK chartered physiotherapists’ personal experiences in using psychological interventions with injured athletes: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(1), pp.58-66 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Brewer, B. W. (2017). Psychology of Sport Injury Rehabilitation. In G. Tenenbaum, & R. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 404-424). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & sons [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Cavin (2019). Injury prevention and rehabilitation. In B. W. Brewer (Ed.), Sport Psychology (pp. 83-96). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Hale, B. D. , Seiser, L. , McGuire, E. J. & Weinrich, E. (2015). Mental Imagery. In J. Taylor, & G. Wilson (Eds.), Applying sport psychology (pp.187-206). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh. (2018). THE AWARENESS OF MOVEMENT AND FITNESS SCIENCES AMONG SCHOOL, UNDER GRADUATE AND POST GRADUATE LEVEL STUDENTS: EMPOWERING EDUCATION THROUGH PHYSICAL EDUCATION. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(3). [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SINGH SIDHU, A. , & SINGH, M. (2022). KINEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF HURDLE CLEARANCE TECHNIQUE IN 110M HURDLE RACE. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 4(2), 28–35. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh, A. , & Singh , D. M. (2013). PROMOTION OF RESEARCH CULTURE –ENHANCING QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 2(2), 202–208. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SINGH, M. , & SINGH SIDHU, A. (2016). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BODY COMPOSITION AND RELATIVE HEALTH STATUS AMONG RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT SCHOOLS OF J&K. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 5(3), 08–13. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh Nathial, D. M. (2012). ANALYZING THE CREDIT BASED SYSTEM IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 1(3), 172–176. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

SHARMA, N. P. , & SINGH, M. (2014). SENIOR AGE GROUP RELATIVE EXERCISES AND IMPACT ON THEIR LIFESTYLE. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences, 3(04), 78–82. Retrieved from [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Hamson-Utley, J. J. & Vazquez, L. (2018). The comeback: Rehabilitating the psychological injury. Athlete Ther Today, 13(5), pp.35-38 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mellalieu, S. D. , Hanton, S. & Thomas, O. (2019). The effects of a motivational general-arousal imagery intervention upon pre-performance symptoms in male rugby union players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, pp.175-185 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Naoi, A. & Ostrow, A. (2018). The effects of cognitive and relaxations interventions on injured athletes’ mood and pain during rehabilitation. The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 10(1) [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Rees, T. , Mitchell, I. , Evans, L. & Hardy, L.


(2020). Stressors, social support and psychological responses to sport injury in high- and low-performance standard participants. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, pp.505-512 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh (2010). Evaluation And Improvement Of Sports Techniques Through Biomechanical Updated Analyzing Technology, University News, Journal of Higher Education Association of Indian Universities, Association of Indian Universities, Vol:48:Issue. 05;2010 Pp45-57, 2010. . (2020). Stressors, social support and psychological responses to sport injury in high- and low-performance standard participants. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, pp.505-512 [Crossref][Google Scholar] [Crossref][Google Scholar]

. . 05;2010 Pp45-57, 2010. . (2020). Stressors, social support and psychological responses to sport injury in high- and low-performance standard participants. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, pp.505-512 [Crossref][Google Scholar] [Crossref][Google Scholar] [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh Nathial, A Study of Adjustment and Emotional Intelligence of University Coaches in India, American Journal of Applied Psychology. Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2014 , pp. 122-126. doi: 10. 11648/j.ajap.20140306.11 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

. . 122-126. doi: 10. 11648/j.ajap.20140306.11 [Crossref][Google Scholar] [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Nathial, Mandeep Singh. A COMPARATIVE AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF SELF-ESTEEM AND JOB SATISFACTION IN ATHLETES AND NON ATHLETES. Journal of Advances in Social Science and Humanities, 2(10). https://doi. org/10.15520/jassh210123 [Crossref][Google Scholar]

Singh, M. , Kour, R. , & Kour, A. ,. A collaborative diversified investigation of respective responses of sports person coaches and organizations on criminalization of doping.International Journal of Health Sciences,6(S3), 11295–11310. [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]

Mandeep Singh. , Assessment of Vocational Interests of Pahadi&Bakarwal School Students In Relation To Their Gender. Int J Recent Sci Res. 9(3), pp. 24817-24819. DOI: [Article][Crossref][Google Scholar]