Nowadays agility has become a crucial factor in team sport, the agility index of athletes, is an indicator of the level of the players. The performance level of many sports disciplines depends on the ability to react promptly to stimulus perceptions of various nature and to complete the kinetic responses as soon as possible and perform the correct execution with the optimal range of motion. Normally the strategies actuated during the sports training are focused on the development of agility in specific movements and to execute specific sport technique in a faster way. In various sports, agility is manifested in various forms: initiating the kinetic response with the least latency time after the stimulus (reaction); completing the single gesture in the shortest possible time (rapidity of action); performing cyclic movements with high frequency (speed); applying power to the movement (acceleration) and maintaining high execution speed even in muscle fatigue condition (prolonged speed movement). Agility is a complex ability because it depends on many factors: nervous system, individual anthropometric characteristics; muscular coordination; muscle quality and characteristics of the gesture (strength, range of motion, precision, complexity and duration). Agility is strongly influenced by body and motor control; to achieve rapid movements, the athletes must acquire a high level of specific technical gestures, so as to, enable them to maintain optimum performance, without significant slowdown, even in problematic situations of instability, adjustment and imbalance. Therefore, coordination, understood as organizing, controlling, regulating, modulating, and adapting the movements, is the basic prerequisite for a quick expression of movement. Team sports, are made up of many phases with high uncertainty (Raiola&D’Isanto 2016ab, Altavilla, &Raiola, 2015), so agility is crucial to performance. Delaying a move means giving the opponent the opportunity to take on an important advantage (Raiola, 2017, Altavilla&Raiola, 2014). In basketball, athletes are forced to make change of direction with very narrow and fast passes in limited spaces to achieve effective play actions, then is easy to understand how much is important to reach and training a high level of specific and not specific agility for a basketball player (D’Isanto et al, 2017, Gaetano et al,2016, Izzo, 1996).

There was significant improvement speed in executing hockey general skill among players using TMGfU model after intervention. This finding supports the importance continuous small sided mini game without skill drills activity able to enhance speed of executing hockey skills. These findings show that TMGfU model compared to SDT was significantly more effective.

This finding was parallel and further supports motor learning theory framework that suggests that there is linear relationship between motor performances of ball control with acquisition of game knowledge a through the mini game. As role of supporting players findings indicated no significant difference between TMGfU and SDT, probably too short intervention period. Therefore supporting players role in adjusting their position to receive ball need longer period of learning and training within game situations Based on findings of using TMGfU original model and Tactical Game model, the study revealed that Maharashtra hockey player with tactical and skill understanding “what to do and how to”